The Results are in: Platelet Indicator Survey

65% would definitely use a platelet indicator, and another 12% said “maybe” or in special situations

Thank you to the 115 of you who participated in our October survey about platelet management and provided your feedback on a platelet temperature indicator. We’re excited to share what we learned….. and even more excited to tell you what we plan to do about it!

A few fast facts from the survey:

  • 65% would definitely use a platelet indicator and another 12% said “maybe” or in special situations

  • 80% of those who would use an indicator want a dual range indicator (20-24oC)

  • Reasons for not returning unused platelets to inventory (most common comments): (1) Time out of blood bank, (2) Uncontrolled/unmonitored environment, including temperature and lack of agitation and (3) Spiked bags, defaced labels

  • 75% of respondents take platelet temperature on return to the blood bank (but few have temperature monitoring during the time period the platelets are out of blood bank control)

The complete Survey Results are presented at the end of this VUEPOINT post.

Interest confirmed at AABB

To further explore the topic, we had a chance to talk about platelet management with many of the blood bankers at AABB. What they told us only validated what we learned in the survey – with patient safety always at the forefront, blood bankers need a better way to both (1) assure temperature compliance and (2) preserve precious platelet supplies. A temperature indicator would monitor platelet “temperature history” for the entire period it is out of blood bank control.

You’ve spoken and we’ve heard you

These recent interactions have revealed a potential new product need in the market. At Temptime, we have initiated the first steps of our new product development process focusing on a dual-range indicator for platelets. We are working to develop a deeper understanding of your needs and identifying potential product and technology solutions..

Get involved!

Temptime’s product development process depends on user input and field trials. If you’d be interested in providing input to the initial design and specifications for this new product development, we welcome your participation. Please email us and we will be in touch with you.

Survey Results

Q1: “Comments” Summary

  • 5-6 responses relative to time away from blood bank, lack of monitoring
  • 3 responses specific to agitation

Q1: “Other” Summary

  • 11 relative to time out of blood bank
  • 7 storage/uncontrolled environment
  • 7 spiked or modified bag/label
  • 5 “no swirling” observed
  • 4 noted “agitation” concerns

Q2: “Other” Summary:

  • 13 relative to time away and/or lack of monitoring/controlled environment (some specified >30 mins, > 2 hours)
  • 11 expired

Q3: Most common Text Responses summary:

  • 36 take temp with thermometer or temperature plate
  • 20 take temperature with IR thermometer
  • 16 “take temperature” (unknown how)
  • 13 use “touch/feel”
  • 7 report platelets returned in cooler, on ice or from fridge
  • 5 report that temp is monitored every 4 hours or constantly, or kept in temperature controlled chamber
  • 4 discard due to time

Q6: Most common Text Responses summary:

  • 6 report low usage or returns
  • 5 reference cost
  • 3 indicate would take temperature if unsure, indicator not needed 

Q8: Most common Text Responses summary:

  • 17 expired/outdated
  • 10 wrong/poor storage, including use of coolers
  • 7 time away from blood bank/control
  • 3 agitation concerns
  • 3 spiking bag and returned