What is “stop temperature?”

Return to Refrigerator Challenge” generates new questions from blood banks

This was the most common question we received from blood bankers in an unprecedented response to our January 2017 VUEPOINT.  In that issue of VUEPOINT, we shared the results of a “Return to Refrigerator Challenge” – where a major university hospital conducted a test to compare two blood temperature indicators.  Their intention was to evaluate indicator performance when unused blood was returned to the blood bank.

Although this was the first time we discussed stop temperature in a VUEPOINT, it’s not the first time we’ve received questions about it from our blood bank contacts. To address those issues, we researched what stop temperature means for indicator manufacturers who use this specification. We found that stop temperature appears to relate to the chemical indication behavior.  This means that if the blood product temperature is below the stop temperature, the indicator does not change color.

How does a 10oC indicator with an 8oC stop temperature behave?

The 10oC indicator used in the challenge has a specified stop temperature of 8oC.  If the blood product begins to exceed the stop temperature (8oC), the 10oC indicator’s chemical indication material melts back to its liquid state. This melting reaction gives users a visual indication that the blood product is no longer in compliance. This type of indicator may signal that the blood product is out of compliance once it exceeds 8oC, even if it never reaches 10oC, as shown in this example.

What does this mean to blood banks using a stop temperature type indicator?

Now that we understand what stop temperature is, the question is what does the specification – and indicator performance – mean to blood banks?  Specifically, what happens if the blood product is hovering around the 8oC stop temperature for any period?

Tests shared by blood banks, combined with our studies, have shown that under a wide range of exposures and times – once the indicator exceeds its stop temperature of 8oC, the indicator may be irreversibly tripped.  In multiple tests, the blood product temperature was being internally monitored to confirm that it remained below the indication temperature of 10oC before being returned to the blood bank refrigerator.  After the blood bags were returned to the refrigerator for reissue, many indicators had tripped during the refrigeration period.

Comments and questions from blood banks based on findings

  • “Doesn’t this make it an 8oC indicator?”
  • “We have many bags that are returned to the blood bank at 8oC and they look OK. We put them in the refrigerator and they show overheated.  This is an 8oC indicator.  We are throwing out good blood.”
  • “This did not show up in the standard validation, and it never occurred to us to try this while performing the validation. After performing the ‘return to refrigerator challenge’ we found that the indicator just did not perform”.

We are grateful for comments and questions like these because they help fuel our blood indicator knowledge and testing.  Clearly, the “stop temperature” specification may be new to many blood banks and is something to be further explored.  Please share your experiences and observations so we can continue learning together.

Validating Temperature Indicators: The “Return to Refrigerator” Challenge

Learn more in this VUEPOINT about indicator comparison tests we conducted based on reports from blood banks experiencing indicators “tripping” after returning blood products to the refrigerator

by Jeffrey Gutkind, Temptime

We are often called on by blood banks to answer questions about temperature indicators and support their validation requirements.  They also interface with us when they are having “issues” with an indicator, whether it’s Safe-T-Vue or a competing product, and are looking for insight and possible solutions.

Temperature indicators “tripping” after return to refrigerator

Several times over the past year we’ve interacted with blood banks experiencing a specific temperature indicator problem.  Here’s how it goes – the unused blood is returned to the blood bank and the indicator shows that it is still in compliance, that it hasn’t exceeded its 10oC indication temperature.   Great!  So, the blood is returned to the blood bank refrigerator for future reissue.

Then, at a later time, the when the blood is removed from the refrigerator for reissue –the indicator has “tripped” or turned color.  How could this be?  If the temperature was in compliance going IN to the refrigerator, how could it then be out of compliance AFTER being refrigerated?

The “Return to Refrigerator Challenge”

Blood Temperature Indicator Comparison

Figure 1: “Return to Refrigerator Challenge” Temperature Indicator Test Setup

In response to this influx of concern from blood banks, we decided to conduct a comparison test.  Fortunately, we had an opportunity to work with a major university medical center to gather validation data focused specifically on the “return to refrigerator” portion of the blood product’s journey. We refer to this test as the “Return to Refrigerator Challenge.”

The purpose of the challenge was to simulate a typical blood product journey – blood being issued to another department, such as the OR, and removed from the cooler for a brief period of time, and then returned to the blood bank.   A temperature probe would be placed in the blood bag, and the performance of two types of 10oC indicators would be compared.

  1. A probe was inserted into a (simulated glycerol-water) blood bag, which was placed in the refrigerator until it reached 4.2oC.
  1. The bag was removed from the refrigerator. Five Safe-T-Vue 10 indicators and five ‘Indicator A’ were affixed to the blood bag. (Figure 1)
  1. The blood temperature was allowed to reach 8.5oC. The indicators were observed and observations recorded (Figure 2).
  1. The blood bag was placed back in the refrigerator at 4.2oC (to simulate blood being returned to the blood bank for reissue) for 30 minutes.
  1. After 30 minutes, the blood bag was removed from the refrigerator. The indicators were observed and observations recorded (see Figure 2).

Figure 2: “Return to Refrigerator Challenge” Indicator Pass and Fail Data

*Note: Accuracy of Safe-T-Vue 10 is +/- 0.4oC and published accuracy of Indicator A is +/- 0.5oC

Challenge proves need to validate indicator performance throughout journey

Comparing the performance of the two indicators (Figure 2), it was apparent that the Safe-T-Vue indicator had accurately performed as expected and within the specifications.   Two of five ‘Indicator A’ had prematurely indicated (at 8.5oC) prior to refrigeration, and all five had failed to perform to specification after refrigeration at 4.2oC for 30 minutes.

Based on the manufacturer’s published accuracy specifications, Safe-T-Vue performed successfully, whereas ‘Indicator A’ failed to perform to specification.  Not only did 2 out of 5 ‘Indicator As’ “trip” at 8.5oC, all five of the indicators had tripped within 30 minutes of being refrigerated at 4.2oC.   This may be due to Indicator A’s published “stop temperature” of 8.0oC.

Is it necessary for you to conduct your own “challenge?”

This “return to refrigerator challenge” proved that the Safe-T-Vue indicator could be validated for returning blood products to the blood bank. If you have confidence in the performance (to specification) of the indicators you are using, then you probably don’t need to conduct your own “challenge.”  But, if you’ve had issues like we described early in this VUEPOINT, where indicators are mysteriously changing while under refrigeration, you may want to conduct the “challenge” to be certain that the indicators are performing as specified.

Validate critical points in your process to confirm indicator performance

The typical, standard validation should help you identify indicators that do not perform to specification (for example the two Indicator A’s that tripped at 8.5oC, which does not meet the published specification of +/- 0.5oC).   The closer look of the “challenge” could be used to confirm additional failure to perform to specification, particularly in situations where the indicator performance seems odd or questionable.

As always, we welcome your feedback on this topic.  And if we can provide validation support or help you address any temperature indicator issues, please contact me.

Jeffrey Gutkind

HELP not HYPE: Being truly useful to blood banks

VUEPOINT posts and website top-ranking pages prove that delivering blood bank help is timeless and valuable

The Williams Labs web site was created with a single goal – provide a place where people involved in blood banking can find information to help them perform their jobs more easily and with better results.

We are delighted that blood bankers from around the world – some who are Safe-T-Vue users and some who are not – routinely visit williamlabs.com and read our VUEPOINT posts because we are providing relevant, useful and helpful information for blood banks.

AABB_Temperature_Standards_2016We’ve also been flattered to learn that blood bank inspectors point blood banks to our website as an easy source of information regarding transport and storage of blood products.

In this VUEPOINT, we share the links to these pages and posts as a quick guide to these informational resources. Maybe they are handy to bookmark for your daily blood bank operations – or perhaps in orienting a new employee? Whatever your reason, it’s here for you and your blood bank staff – with our continued focus on helping you do your best.

Top 5 Useful and Helpful Pages

1. AABB Temperature Standards for Blood Products: Storage and Transport
This table provides fast access to the newest 2016 AABB Reference Standard 5.1.8.A for storage and transport temperatures of blood components.

2. Simulated Blood Product RecipesSimulated_Blood_Products_Validation
We first published this VUEPOINT almost 4 years ago, and based on the web statistics, it continues to be a valuable resource for blood banks. Did you know that 10% glycerol in water is NOT “one size fits all?” You might want to read this one and learn more.


3. QA Documents
It doesn’t sound glamorous or intriguing, but the incredibly useful nature of having QA documents for the Safe-T-Vue products easily accessible 24/7/365 has proven to be a winner. No hype, just help.Safe-T-Vue_QA_Docs

4. Category: Storage of Blood Components
This page provides titles and excerpts of all the VUEPOINT posts in the category “Storage of Blood Components” that we’ve published over the years. Scroll down the page and you’ll quickly find information on IR Thermometers, Cooler Validation, Refrigerator Setpoints, Indicator Comparisons and more.

5. Tags: Blood Temperature
Similar to #4 “Storage of Blood Components” this page presents almost 5 years of VUEPOINT posts that have something to do with blood temperature – measuring, monitoring, and managing.

We are always looking to learn from you – about how we can be more helpful and genuinely useful by providing valuable information to blood bankers worldwide. If you have suggestions for VUEPOINT topics or questions you’d like for us to explore – and share – we would be delighted to hear from you.


Jeff Gutkind

3 Things You Need to Know

About Blood Temperature Indicators

Do you trust a product to protect your blood supplies that may “auto activate?” Would you be discarding expensive blood products because of an unreliable indicator?

1. Accuracy Matters

Of the indicators on the market, one is clearly less accurate. “Indicator A” can reach endpoint at 9o, resulting in wasted blood – blood that may actually be in compliance.

2. Performance Varies Greatly

The fine print for a competing indicator clearly states that AFTER ACTIVATION, the temperature of the blood needs to be brough back down to its 8oC “Stop Temperature” to avoid premature indication.

This means that the indicator could prematurely indicate at a temperature as low as 8oC if the blood bank doesn’t take the extra step to ensure that the blood – after attaching an activated indicator – is cooled below this “stop temperature.”

3. Lower Price May Not Be Lowest Cost

Comparing indicator purchase price may make it seem like an easy choice.  however, the actual COST of an indicator that is:

  • poor performing
  • less accurate, or
  • unreliable

is dramatic in comparison to the cost of wasted blood products.

Knowing that, on average:

  • blood banks receive a significant amount of issued blood back
  • ONE unit of wasted blood may cost the blood bank $250
It only makes sense that a more reliable indicator that reaches endpoint at 9.6oC (and not as low as 8.0oC) is a more cost effective choice.

Handy Tip

Safe-T-Vue lot-by-lot QA documents are posted here on our website for easy customer access – and prove that Safe-T-Vue is manufactured to quality standards.


IR Thermometers: Determining Blood Product Temperature on Return to Blood Bank

Learn as we explore common misconceptions about IR thermometers and surface temperature vs. core temperature

The following PathLabTalk post describes something we encounter repeatedly in blood banks – and illustrates several problematic misconceptions about determining blood product temperature on return to the blood bank. At the same time, this post demonstrates a reliable, good practice!

“Our transfusion service is looking for an infrared thermometer that we can use to determine the internal temperature of our donor units. We issue products in validated coolers to surgery, ED, and other locations and sometimes we receive the products back that have not been used. Currently, we attach a temperature indicator to the unit, but want something more accurate that is not difficult to operate, calibrate, etc….”1

First, we congratulate this PathLabTalk poster for reaching out to the blood bank community for ideas and support. She/he has realistic, everyday needs that many may identify with. In this VUEPOINT, we present some problems and misconceptions, along with this blood banker’s good practices, that are communicated in the post.

Problem #1
Infrared Thermometers (a.k.a. Infrared “Guns”) do not measure “internal temperature”

Infrared thermometers are used to measure surface temperature without contacting the product being measured. Most specifications for these devices state “non-contact surface temperature measurement.” They do not measure “core temperature” of any product, including blood. Infrared thermometers are used in many different applications ranging from food service, to residential heating/cooling, to industrial. Typically they are used for “hard to reach” areas where contact temperature measurement is difficult/impossible.

Problem #2
A one-time temperature reading of a returned blood product provides little assurance that the blood was kept at the correct storage or transport temperature over the entire time period that it was out of blood bank control.

No matter how well everyone is trained and how conscientious they are, we all know that once the blood product leaves the blood bank, anything can happen. For example, in the OR or ED there are many critical functions being performed at once, and often over long periods of time. Blood can be taken from the cooler and left on a table for hours – and then returned to the blood bank, having had time to “cool” to what may appear to be an acceptable temperature.

The precariousness of this situation is compounded when an IR thermometer is used to check SURFACE temperature when the product is returned.
• Perhaps the blood bag was placed on an OR table for 6 hours during a long procedure, but was placed back in the cooler just long enough for the SURFACE to cool to a seemingly “acceptable” temperature…?
• Is it safe to assume that the blood temperature never reached unsafe temperatures?

Problem #3
Accuracy of IR Thermometers is affected by how they are used – due to “Distance to Target” A.K.A. FOV (Field of View) or D/S Ratio (Distance to Spot)

Accuracy specifications for most IR thermometers range from +/- 1.0oC to +/- 2oC. Looking at a few models from major manufacturers, their D/S specifications are documented as: 1 meter, 1.5 meters and 2 meters – which might surprise blood bankers using IR thermometers. The distance between the device and the target (blood product) affects the reading accuracy – and also means that the dependability and repeatability of temperature readings is “user dependent” in how they use the IR thermometer from variable distances (you’ll read about this problem in the PathLabTalk post responses). If you’d like to learn more about this particular characteristic, Grainger (industrial and facilities maintenance equipment resource) has an excellent “Quick Tip” on IR thermometers.

Good Practice

Temperature indicators provide irreversible visual evidence if the blood product exceeds its specified temperature, even if the product is “re-cooled” prior to return to the blood bank.
Attaching an irreversible temperature indicator to the blood product, as done by the PathLabTalk poster, IS one way to know if the blood was maintained at correct storage/transport temperatures. When the blood product reaches the indication temperature (typically 6oC or 10oC), the indicator provides “irreversible” visual evidence of the temperature excursion – even if the blood product is “re-cooled” after being out of blood bank control.

This elicits a similar question that we raised regarding IR thermometers – do temperature indicators that adhere to the surface of the blood product provide indication of the surface temperature or core temperature?

Safe-T-Vue indicators (Temptime Corporation) are chemical indicators, and the algorithms that are used to formulate them are based on thousands of laboratory tests that incorporate the CORE blood product temperature. While the indicator may be applied to the surface, its color response is correlated to core temperature.

Why this all matters

Bacteria are very rarely transmitted during blood component transfusion, but if they are, they usually cause severe, life-threatening adverse reactions, with the mortality rate of 20-30%.2

Periodically, there are reports of incidents likely to have caused serious injury or death, that have been linked to bacterial sepsis from blood products that were dispensed for extremely long surgeries, and returned to the blood bank unused.3 Those very products could be returned to inventory after checking the temperature with an IR thermometer, and reissued to another patient. Unbeknownst to the blood bank, the blood products may have reached temperatures that allowed for contaminants to thrive. When that unit is then reissued and transfused to the next patient, the results can be catastrophic.

Kudos to the PathLabTalk poster for good practice

In summary, we understand that it’s unrealistic to assume that blood products will be handled outside of the blood bank with the same watchful eye and expertise that trained, focused blood bankers have. And there is little certainty of blood product maintenance at appropriate storage/transport temperatures, even when using a temperature sensing device to check the product on return to the blood bank.

The most sure way to know that the blood did not reach non-compliant temperatures – that could result in bacterial sepsis – is to use an irreversible temperature indicator that stays with the blood product during its entire time out of the blood bank – as the PathLabTalk post noted.

1. http://www.pathlabtalk.com/forum/index.php?/topic/6436-infrared-thermometer/

2. http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs-wm/27955.pdf

3.  http://www.jsonline.com/watchdog/watchdogreports/problems-at-hospital-lab-show-lax-regulation-hidden-mistakes-b99585186z1-330324081.html

Blood Banks: Get “Inspection-Ready” with these Tips and Resources

Avoid panic! 3 Tips to make your inspection a proactive, collaborative, and educational experience

While the purpose of a blood bank inspection is ultimately educational, does the mere mention of it invoke anxiety in your staff? We’d like to help put some of that to rest with solid resources and some sound advice.

In this VUEPOINT, we guide you to two journal articles that are educational about the “who, when and why” of lab inspections, giving practical advice and resource links.

We were also fortunate to speak with Jim Baldridge, MT (ASCP) SBB, who is the Manager of Blood Bank Pathology at Providence – Little Company of Mary Medical Center in Torrance, California. Jim has been involved in the business of blood banks for almost 35 years, has performed AABB assessments, and currently conducts CAP (College of American Pathologists) inspections. And, you’ll find that Jim’s real-life experience supports the recommendations provided in the two articles.

3 Things you can do to prepare and get the most from your inspection

Jim Baldridge’s suggestions mirrored some of those you’ll see in both articles – including “locate, review and complete the reference guide (or checklist) that the inspector will use.” Here are three tips from Jim:

Tip #1
“Prior to the inspection, go through the checklist and have everything located and notated for the inspector,” said Jim. “This will allow the inspector to get to exactly what they are looking for, and move on. Use the checklist like a script.”

He also noted that this method of preparation allows the lab to have a permanent checklist that you can “roll forward” to the next inspection. “When revisions to the checklist are published you can address those new requirements, but you’ve already laid the groundwork for your inspection by completing the bulk of the work.”

Tip #2
Start a folder and keep copies of questions asked and documents requested during the inspection. “As the inspection progresses, it’s helpful to make a list of any questions that are asked, and make yourself a copy of any records the inspector requests – and put them in a folder. At the end of the day, you can go through the folder and debrief yourself – and prepare for the next day.” He also noted that it’s a good time to make notes for future inspections – – and this takes the pressure off of you to trust your memory!

Tip #3 
Look at the inspection as a collaborative process and expect positive outcomes. “I’ve found that in most inspections I’ve learned things and gotten good ideas. I’ve been able to borrow procedures and forms from others, and incorporate them into my policies. This is particularly true with CAP inspections, since they are peer reviews,” he added. “Preparation respects the time of the inspector, and a positive, collaborative attitude can help you get the most from the experience.”

Helpful journal articles

They’re Here! How to Prepare Your Blood Bank for Inspection was published in the April 24, 2015 issue of LabMedicine1, and provides a wealth of information. It’s a valuable resource, with helpful links at the end. In the article you’ll find:
• Overview of Agencies that perform inspections – CMS, FDA, AABB and CAP
• Explanation of terms used in inspections
• Practical Advice from 3 individuals – a QA specialist, a blood bank manager and an assessor
Click here for PDF

Is it an inspection, audit or assessment?

Per the article, while the agencies use different terminology, these terms are often used interchangeably, as are the terms ‘checklist’ and ‘assessment tool.’ You’ll find explanations of all of these terms in the article.

“Is Your Lab Inspection Ready?”
This article appeared in Medical Laboratory Observer2, June 2013, and provides a comprehensive list of the various organizations, and includes detailed information about their purposes, resources and checklists (assessment tools), where applicable. (Please note that since this article was published in 2013, some links may be invalid).


SURVEY: Temperature Indicators & Platelet Bacterial Contamination

“Sepsis from a bacterially contaminated platelet unit represents the most frequent infectious complication from any blood product today.”1

Would a temperature indicator help your blood bank improve quality control, patient outcomes and platelet discard rates?
Take the Survey: Click Here

Because platelets are stored at room temperature, their shelf life is limited to 5 days due to the risk for bacterial growth during storage. Bacterial contamination of platelets is a major concern because of the rich plasma environment at room temperature. All apheresis platelets are sampled and cultured for bacteria growth prior to issue. Platelets that have exceeded the AABB guideline temperature range (20 – 24°C) are at greater risk for elevated bacterial counts. When this happens, not only is the patient risk high, but there are also intense challenges on the blood bank to maintain adequate platelet supplies AND assure patient safety.

As a major manufacturer of temperature indicators for healthcare applications, we are interested to hear from you about the possible application of a temperature indicator for platelets (PLTs). For that reason, we’re conducting a survey.

Publications on Platelets

Just this past November, AABB published clinical guidelines on appropriate use of platelet transfusion in adult patients, developed by a panel of twenty-one experts (named in the article). These guidelines appear in the February 2015 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine. While the article provides six recommendations specific to platelets and transfusions, it states early in the article that:

“Sepsis from a bacterially contaminated platelet unit represents the most frequent infectious complication from any blood product today.”1

In a 2011 article in Transfusion, the author noted that “…outdating PLTs is a financial burden and a waste of a resource.”2

In response to this recent attention to platelets, we’ve considered whether an irreversible temperature indicator for platelets would help protect patients AND reduce the financial burden associated with outdated PLTs.

Please CLICK HERE to take our survey
and share your thoughts.

In this short survey, we’d like to learn more about your blood bank’s platelet inventory management – and to get your ideas on the possible value of a platelet temperature indicator.

After the survey closes, we’ll publish the responses so you can learn from each other. Survey participants will receive a pre-release of the results – and also be entered in the AABB drawing in Anaheim to win a FREE Val-A-Sure Cooler Validation Kit!

Thank you for taking time to participate in the survey. We look forward to your input, and are happy to provide a forum for sharing ideas in VUEPOINT.

Jeff Gutkind

For the entire AABB Guidelines: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the AABB.

1 Stramer SL. Current risks of transfusion-transmitted agents: a review. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007; 131:702-7.

2 Fuller AK, Uglik KM, Braine HG, King KE. Transfusion. 2011 Jul;51(7):1469-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.03039.x. Epub 2011 Feb 8.

COMZ VUEPOINT (doc. 2371)

Cooler Validation: Comparison of “Manual” Thermometer vs. “Automated” Data Logger Methods

In our March 2012 survey of over 70 blood banks, many respondents generally described cooler validation as a “pain,” characterizing it as time-consuming, frustrating and even primitive.

Most blood banks revalidate their transport coolers annually. And although it is only once a year, there never seems to be a good time or resource-efficient way to do it.

Using multiple data loggers allows more accurate temperature mapping of the cooler interior.

The three key factors we hear repeated most often are:
1. Time Efficiency (technician’s time)
2. Data Accuracy
3. Simplifying Documentation

At the SCABB/CBBS meeting last month, we entertained compelling discussions with blood bankers who have switched from manual cooler validations with thermometers, to using data loggers (electronic temperature recorders). Some of them are using the Val-A-SureTM Cooler Validation Kit.

If you’ve ever considered switching to an automated validation process, we thought it might be helpful to share what we’ve learned from blood bankers across the country. In the following table (next page) we compare the traditional “manual” thermometer method to the “automated” data logger method – and capture how it has changed their validation experiences.

This graph displays temperature of the top bag vs. the bottom bag. The data is downloaded from data loggers and printed for permanent validation documentation, eliminating handwritten and transcribed data.

We’ll be giving away a Val-A-Sure Cooler Validation Kit at AABB 2015, so if you’re interested in a “free” chance to change your cooler validation method, be sure to stop by and see us!

Jeffrey Gutkind

P.S. For more on Transport and Storage Coolers, check out our Tips, Helpful Ideas and AABB Standards References on www.williamlabs.com.

COMZ VUEPOINT – Cooler Validation-Comparison of Manual Thermometer vs. Automated Data Logger Methods – web version (doc. 2341)

Are all temperature indicators created equal?

When it comes to cost and performance, how do you choose?

by Jeffrey Gutkind

In today’s cost-conscious healthcare environment, our immediate reaction when making a buying decision is to minimize purchase cost.   The temperature indicators currently on the market have different costs.  And there are questions you may be asking:

  • is the “cheapest” purchase price going to save the blood bank money overall?
  • are all indicators equal in terms of performance?
  • how do you know which indicator to choose?

To answer these questions, let’s take a step back and question WHY we even use temperature indicators.

Temperature indicators for blood products were originally designed to provide assurance that blood product temperatures had not exceeded AABB temperature guidelines when the blood is out of the blood bank’s control. The temperature indicator provides proof that the blood product has been maintained at proper temperature while out of the blood bank control.

Numerous visitors to our AABB booth a few weeks ago stated that 40-50% of the blood issued from their blood banks is not used. To further illustrate the challenge, a journal article recently published in Transfusion (shared in our August 2014 VUEPOINT), described a study by a blood bank that stated how most of their blood waste was from either temperature or time (away from the blood bank) excursions, and that 70% of those losses came from blood products issued to the OR in coolers.  Temperature indicators are used by blood banks worldwide for exactly this reason – to provide assurance that the blood products at no time exceeded temperature thresholds, to help maintain blood product quality and to minimize blood waste.

So, other than cost, what matters when choosing an indicator?

Let’s circle back to our initial questions of the temperature indicator cost and the temperature indicator performance.  Since the job of a temperature indicator is to provide temperature information back to the blood bank, the indicator’s temperature ACCURACY (also referred to as “tolerance”) is critical.

As an example, of the three most popular 10o C temperature indicators on the market today, each publishes a different accuracy specification:

  • Safe-T-Vue 10  +/- 0.4 o C
  • Indicator A +/- 0.5 o C
  • Indicator B +/- 1.0 o C

How does indicator accuracy influence blood product waste?

In this illustration, you can see that a 10oC indicator with an accuracy of  +/- 1.0 may actually “trip” at 9 o C, thus falsely indicating that the temperature of the blood is out of specification.  And, as we all know, the cost of wasted blood itself far exceeds the purchase price of an indicator – and minimizing blood waste (not indicator cost) is the primary objective behind using a temperature indicator.

Using an average cost of $250.00 for a single wasted blood unit, it’s easy to calculate the potential savings of using a more accurate temperature indicator.   The cost difference in temperature indicators is minimal in comparison to the cost of one wasted unit of blood.

When comparing temperature indicators to make a buying decision, be sure to make ACCURACY comparison a key factor in your selection process.  Safe-T-Vue indicators are available in 6°C and 10°C temperature indications, both accurate within +/-0.4°C.  *

As always, we welcome your comments and feedback on the ideas presented in this VUEPOINT.


Jeffrey Gutkind

* Refer to AABB standards for blood banks and transfusion services, 21 CFR 640.2, 21 CFR 640.4, and 21 CFR 600.15.

Reduce RBC and FFP Waste, Improve ROI

Learn more from this Blood Transport and Storage Initiative that resulted in significant ROI

by Jeff Gutkind, Business Development Manager

I recently read an article in the journal Transfusion1 in reference to reducing red blood cell (RBC) and plasma (FFP) waste.  The study showed significant reduction in RBC and FFP waste by using a new blood transport and storage system, and a significant return on their investment in the new system (estimated savings of $9000/month for their institution).

While the article doesn’t speak to temperature indicators, it does seem to validate that there is a trend toward cooler storage in the OR being considered “intraoperative storage,” which is significant.

For those of us sensitive to blood waste (and associated costs) due to time-temperature issues, this study has a wealth of valuable information and powerful messages:The article cites a national waste rate for hospital-issued blood products ranging from 0% to 6%, and a common reason for blood waste being inadequate intraoperative storage.2

  • The article describes how most of their blood waste was from either temperature or time (away from the blood bank) excursions, and that 70% of those losses came from blood product issued to the OR in coolers.
  • In the second paragraph they state that “AABB standards require red blood cell and plasma units to be maintained at a temperature of 1-10°C during transport and 1-6°C during intraoperative storage.
  • They go on to state (under Materials and Methods) that “holding product in the OR represents a storage condition“….. and “the storage (1-6°C), not the more lenient transport (1-10°C) temperature range needed to be maintained.”

Their previous procedure was to issue blood products to the OR in off-the-shelf commercial coolers that were validated to hold product at 1-10°C for 8 hours. They changed to a new, more expensive cooler that incorporated specialty phase change material that is validated to hold 1-6°C for 18 hours. As a result of the new system and strategy, they have improved their “storage” compliance to 1-6°C and reduced waste from 1.20% to 0.06%, which they calculate to save the $9,000 per MONTH.

The result of this study suggests that incorporating a new, longer duration blood shipping and storage container has allowed the OR to store blood for up to 18 hours at 1-6°C while meeting AABB’s more strict guidelines and has produced significant cost savings and notable return on investment 

It would be interesting to see the savings if they incorporated a Safe-T-Vue 6 indicator in this study.


1. Brown MJ, Button LM, Badjie KS, Guyer JM, Dhanaroker SR, Brach EJ, Johnson PM, Stubbs JR. Implementation of an intraoperative blood transport and storage initiative and its effect on reducing red blood cell and plasma waste, Transfusion 2014;54: 710-07.

2. Heltimiller ES, Hill RB, Marshall CE, Parsons FJ, Berkow LC, Barrasso CA, Zink EK, Ness PM. Blood wastage reduction using Lean Sigma methodology. Transufions 2010;50: 1887-96.